A Story Of Grace Study No. 218
llow me to tell you a story. We can start this story in the winter of 1935. The nation was in the throes of the great depression. It’s hard for us to imagine in today’s affluent society just how desperate those days were. Well do I remember, as a child, people knocking on our back door begging for food. Mom always fed them. Long lines of hungry people were standing in front of soup kitchens waiting for something to eat. Jobs were virtually nonexistent, and money was as precious as it was scarce.
There was a man by the name of Fiorello LaGuardia who was the mayor of New York City during those dark days. LaGuardia seemed to have a genuine heartfelt love for the common man, especially the downtrodden. One time, during a newspaper strike, he spent his Sunday mornings reading the funny papers over the radio, and with all the appropriate inflections. Why? He didn’t want the children of New York to be deprived of that little bit of enjoyment. He was well- known for his blustery outbursts against the “bums” that exploited the poor. He was completely unpredictable and full of surprises.
One night he showed up at a night court in one of the poorest wards of the city; and that’s where this phase of our story begins. He dismissed the presiding judge for the evening and sent him home to his family. Then the mayor himself took over the bench.
As it happened on that bitterly cold night, a tattered old woman stood before the bench, accused of stealing a loaf of bread. You must understand these were desperate times. A lot of people were going hungry.
With quivering lips and tear filled eyes, she admitted to the theft. But, she added, “my daughter’s husband has deserted her, she is sick, and her children are crying because they have nothing to eat.”
The shopkeeper, however, refused to drop the charges. “It’s a bad neighborhood your honor, she’s guilty,” he shouted. “The law must be upheld, she’s got to be punished to teach other people a lesson.” LaGuardia knew that her accuser was right. The very office that he swore to uphold required that he enforce the letter of the law.
LaGuardia sighed. He turned to the old women and said, “I’ve got to punish you; the law makes no exceptions.” He then pronounced the sentence. The old woman shuddered when she heard the words, “ten dollars or ten days in jail.” But already the judge was reaching into his pocket. He pulled out a ten-dollar bill and threw it into his hat. “Here’s the ten-dollar fine, which I now remit. Furthermore, I’m fining everyone in this courtroom fifty cents for living in a town where a person has to steal bread so that her grandchildren can eat. Mr. Bailiff, collect the fines and give them to the defendant.”
Sitting in that courtroom that night were about seventy petty criminals, a few New York policemen, and her accuser, a fuming, red-faced, storekeeper. The bewildered old grandmother left the courtroom with $47.50. This was enough to buy groceries for several months.
That’s a very good story and it’s a true story, but how is that relevant to us today? Let’s review the event and see what really took place that cold winter evening.
1. Was the storekeeper correct in his accusation? Yes. The old woman had committed a crime.
2. Was guilt confessed? Yes. She admitted the theft.
3. Did her reason for stealing make any difference to the law? No. The law can make no exceptions.
4. Was the judgment decreed and sentencing pronounced? Yes. The old grandmother was found guilty and sentenced to a fine she could not pay.
5. Was justice carried through, thus satisfying the law? Yes. The fine was paid in full.
6. Was grace extended? Yes. The guilty party walked out of that courtroom completely free and her penalty paid.
7. Did the guilty party do anything at all to deserve or earn the grace received? Not a thing. It was free, and there for her to accept.
8. Was the law done away? No. The law is still intact; and it’s still against the law to steal bread in New York City. The law was neither changed, adjusted, sidestepped nor done away.
9. Having received grace, is the grandmother now free of the law to go steal again? As Paul would say, “God forbid.”
10.Could we therefore conclude, that:
a. The law was fulfilled,
b. Justice was done,
c. Her accuser silenced,
d. Compassion won out over the law,
e. Yet the law is still intact.
I think we have no other choice. What about you?
Actually, we started this story in the middle. Have you ever walked into the middle of a movie, and then had to sit through the beginning in order to understand the ending? You see, our story actually began nearly six thousand years ago, in the Garden of Eden, with the fall of man.
Can you see the parallel? Can’t you imagine Satan standing before God’s throne shouting, “GUILTY, GUILTY! You must enforce the law. There can be no exceptions”? And there is mankind, the weight of guilt too heavy to bear, a penalty too horrible to contemplate.
Does it matter how justifiable the reason for our crime, or what excuse we offer. Like LaGuardia said, “The law can make no exceptions.” Just as LaGuardia had to uphold the laws of New York City, God had to uphold His heavenly laws.
Satan had succeeded, it seemed, in forcing God to choose between destroying the law, or destroying mankind. It’s either-or, for God to be true, for God to be righteous, for God to be God, action had to be taken. Otherwise the law is effete and of none effect; and the very foundation of the government of God is challenged. For no government can function without law.
What then must be done? It was man that sinned; therefore man must pay. But if man pays, then man will be no more. Satan will have accomplished his objective; which was then, as it is now, to destroy mankind.
But what if there should come a second Adam? What if another Adam should come who is totally obedient to God? Completely sinless, and qualified in every way to pay the death penalty for all who come to Him in humble submission. Could He, would He, step into man’s place and die in his stead?
We read of just such a Man in Revelation 5:5, where it tells us of the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, who has qualified to open the book of life. As a matter of fact we read of Him from Genesis to Revelation. The scarlet thread of His redeeming blood can be traced throughout the Bible. He is described in Philippians 2:6-8 as being in the form of God, but humbled Himself to the likeness of man. He came to serve, not to be served; and was obedient unto death.
Just as Adam’s sin sentenced every human to death, so this Man offers eternal life to everyone who believes in Him. And having accepted and believed the works that God has done through His Son, we then become buried with Him in baptism into His death. Paul tells us in Romans 6:4-5 that, “like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, we also shall be raised in the likeness of His resurrection.”
God’s inspired word tells us in Romans 5:19, “For if by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall all be made righteous.” And in I Corinthians 15:22, “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ, shall all be made alive.” Also in verse 45, “And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.”
What would our answers be if we asked the same questions about the grace extended to us, as we did about the grace extended to the old grandmother? Well, let’s do that and find out.
1. Is our accuser correct in his accusation? Yes. All mankind has sinned.
2. Was guilt confessed? Yes. We have confessed our sins before God.
3. Did our reason for sinning make any difference to the law? No. The law can make no exceptions.
4. Was judgment decreed and sentencing pronounced? Yes. All mankind was found guilty and sentenced to a penalty we could not pay.
5. Was justice carried out, thus satisfying the law? Yes. The death decree was paid in full.
6. Was grace extended? Yes. The guilty party rose up from the waters of baptism completely free and the penalty was paid in full.
7. Did the guilty party do anything at all to deserve or earn the grace received? Not a thing. It was free, and there for us to accept.
8. Was the law done away? No. The law is still intact; and it’s still against the law to disobey God. The law was not destroyed, and not one jot or tittle was changed, adjusted, eliminated, or passed from the law. That includes the Ten Commandments. Review Christ’s own words in Mathew 5:17-48 if you have any doubt.
9. Having received grace, are we now free of the law to continue in sin?
As Paul said in Romans 3:31, “. . . God forbid: yea, we establish the law.”
Also Romans 6:15-16, “What then? Shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid. Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?”
But haven’t we been told, maybe even read that the law was nailed to the cross? Does it really say that? Well let’s go to the source and find out. We read in Colossians 2:14, “having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.” NASU.
What is a certificate of debt? The law is not a certificate of debt. It is never referred to in those terms. A certificate of debt is like an IOU or a mortgage; a note that has to be paid. It was our decree of guilt, not the law that was nailed to the cross. The Man who was nailed to the cross paid the penalty that was decreed for us. If the law could have been done away, why would it be necessary for Jesus to die?
You see it’s not really an either-or question as Satan thought. It was not necessary to destroy mankind, and grace does not destroy or replace the law.
Paul tells us in Hebrews 8:10, “For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people,” KJV. He repeats the same statement in chapter 10 and verse 16.
Paul is quoting Ezekiel. These are the same laws God gave Israel. By putting them in our mind, God has opened up our knowledge and understanding of them. By writing them in our heart, we will never forget them, and our heart’s desire will be to obey them. In Romans 6:17, Paul tells us we obey from the heart. If God’s laws are not in your heart, you will find many logical-sounding reasons not to obey them, just like Eve did.
10. Could we therefore conclude, that:
a. The law was fulfilled,
b. Justice was done,
c. Our accuser silenced,
d. Compassion (grace) won out over the law,
e. Yet the law is still intact, and always will be.
Isaiah, speaking of Christ, writes, “He will magnify the law and make it honourable,” Isaiah 42:21.
I think we have no other choice but to say yes to all of the above. What about you?
Certainly our salvation is secure in Jesus Christ, but our blessings come from obedience.
Well, that’s my story and I’m sticking to it.
— by Delmar L. Leger, 61389 Tombstone Drive, Montrose CO 81401, Phone: (970) 249-6857. All rights reserved, reprinted with permission. W
Note: This sermon was delivered on the opening night of the Feast of Tabernacles, 2002, at Grand Junction, Colorado. It was received with a standing ovation by the brethren. However, the Church leadership was highly displeased with the message, and on the last day of the festival, Elder Leger was fired.